Saturday, 29 November 2008

Gnu Force.com?

In a recent interview with the Guardian Richard Stallman GNU founder and Free Software campaigner said that Cloud Computing is a trap http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/sep/29/cloud.computing.richard.stallman

"One reason you should not use web applications to do your computing is that you lose control," he said. "It's just as bad as using a proprietary program. Do your own computing on your own computer with your copy of a freedom-respecting program. If you use a proprietary program or somebody else's web server, you're defenceless. You're putty in the hands of whoever developed that software."

At the root of this is his fear that once they have got you hooked they can make you pay through the nose but is this realistic? Even if you put your software on your software on your own web server you would be at the mercy of a proprietary chip maker and if you want to implement a high volume internet application you need to have access to an internet backbone which is again another dependency even if you could access it directly.

The fact is we are all dependent on proprietary computer infrastructure of some kind and we have to rely to some extent on the vendors not extorting us too much really out of self interest. They understand that in order to grow their business they need to sell us more and that its better to have willing customers than a blackmail victims.

That is not deny the contribution that the Free Software foundation and the Open Source movement has made, but I would argue that its main benefit has been in fostering innovation. Allowing via the LAMP stack for example a host of Internet based businesses to be created. Its difficult to believe that a proprietary vendor like Microsoft would have facilitated that development because its focus would have been on meeting the needs of its target corporate IT customers.

Currently there is no doubt in my mind that the Salesforce.com .Force platform offers the best cloud computing infrastructure and that more and more people will start to take advantage of the benefits of moving to the cloud. These are largely connected with not worrying about building infrastructure but on concentrating on the added value of the application. The best response from the Free Software adherents is not to stand on the sidelines wringing their hands or taking the occasional pot-shots about privacy but take it head on and develop an open source multi-tenant database with a Java like Data Manipulation Language (DML) that could provide a real alternative. There's your challenge Richard. Good Luck!


Monday, 24 November 2008

Salesforce in the Cloud

Salesforce.com has been a leader in cloud computing since its inception. Although launched as on demand CRM solution other SaaS applications have always been part of the vision. You only have to see the No Software logo to realise that.

Two years ago Salesforce launched the Force platform and more recently VisualForce to enable third party developers to deploy applications on the Salesforce.com cloud platform.At the recent Dreamforce conference more announcements , such as Sites, were made which demonstrate the Commitment of salesforce.com to this goal.

Other bigger players are now beginning to show their hand: Google has had its app engine around since 2007 and Amazon is pushing its Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) and most recently Microsoft announced Azure.

Who will win? Well without doubt Salesforce.com offers the best technical solution because its multi-tenant database scales so much more easily than the other solutions but its achiles heel is its reluctance to fully embrace a VAR model. With Amazon a vendor can buy the service embed his application and resell it and of course Microsoft have well established reseller channels.

Salesforce have taken the first steps along the VAR route by offering an embedded licence but this only applies to a single app. If a vendor wants to integrate other third party apps to provide a complete solution then the customer must buy a platform licence from Salesforce.

Its early days and this is very much an evolving situation. Its easy to see that Salesforce.com does not want to risk cannabalising its revenues streams and changing from a culture of centralised control to decentralised management is a challenge but if it wants to compete with the other vendors who are looking to park their tanks on the Salesforce cloud computing lawn, it will need to unleash its own attack dogs.